ShopIEC 60079-14:2024 Annex C

IEC 60079-14
Annex C test equipment.

The Annex C cable pressure test is now normative in IEC 60079-14:2024. Where the Ex d selection flowchart calls for it, you need documented evidence for the specific cable construction you are using, and a catalogue reference on its own may not be enough.

We build test equipment to the Annex C specification so you can generate that evidence in house, and we supply the procedure and records to go with it.

Digital manometer reading pressure on the test rig
5,000 cm³
Test enclosure volume, ±200
0.3 kPa
Test pressure applied
5 sec
Observation period
50%
Maximum pressure drop to pass
Equipment

Three ways to get your evidence

Every dimension and tolerance in Annex C is prescribed, and our kit meets them. Buy it calibrated in house or with UKAS traceability, or have the test done for you by an accredited laboratory.

01

Annex C
Test Kit

Non-UKAS calibrated
£499
—Sealed 5,000 cm³ (±200 cm³) rigid test enclosure
—Cable entry arranged to apply minimal mechanical pressure to the cable surface
—Hand pump, isolating valve and connecting hoses
—Digital pressure instrument accurate to ±0.01 kPa, calibrated in house
—Documented test procedure, report template and calibration log
Best for
Manufacturers testing for internal design decisions, where the record does not need traceable accreditation.
Enquire
02

Annex C
Test Kit

UKAS calibrated
£899
—Identical rig to the non-UKAS kit
—Pressure instrument supplied with a UKAS calibration certificate, traceable to national standards
—Satisfies the calibration traceability an assessor expects under ISO/IEC 80079-34
—Documented test procedure, report template and calibration log
Best for
Manufacturers whose Annex C records form part of their QMS evidence and will be seen by an assessor.
Enquire
03

Accredited
Testing & Report

Third party, with Element
On request
—Test carried out by an accredited laboratory
—Third-party test certificate and report for the specific cable construction
—Cable identified by manufacturer, type, size and conductor count
—Delivered in partnership with Element Materials Technology
—No equipment to buy, calibrate or maintain
Best for
Manufacturers testing occasionally, or where independent verification carries more weight with an inspector or end user.
Enquire

Prices exclude VAT and delivery. Lead times, multi-unit pricing and recalibration costs on request. Accredited testing is quoted per cable construction.

The test

Four steps, and one pass criterion

A cable that fails does so because the gaps between its conductors are large enough to let pressure escape, the same gaps that would let a flame front travel along the core. That is why a catalogue description and a visual check are not evidence.

Training on cable and gland selection
01Fit the sample. A representative cable sample 0.5 m long, ±10 mm, fitted to the sealed enclosure so minimal mechanical pressure acts on the cable surface. The test assesses the cable, not gland compression.
02Pressurise to 0.3 kPa. Air introduced through the hand pump via the isolating valve, monitored on an instrument accurate to at least ±0.01 kPa.
03Close the valve and observe for 5 seconds. The pressure must not drop by more than 50 per cent. More than that, and the cable needs a barrier-type entry device for that installation.
04Record it properly. Identify the cable by manufacturer, type, size and number of conductors. Generic category testing is not sufficient: the tested construction is the evidenced construction.
Why buy it from us

We helped write
the requirement

Jon Hichens represented the UK on the IEC TC 31 committee that developed Edition 6 of IEC 60079-14, where the selection flowchart and the Annex C requirements were finalised. Before insightEx he spent seven years in R&D and certification at a cable gland manufacturer, testing barrier and non-barrier glands.

So the kit is not a generic pressure rig with a label on it. It is built by people who have run this test for a living and know what an inspector asks next.

About us
FAQs

Questions we are asked most

Still not covered? Send us the question. An engineer answers, not a chatbot.

What does the Annex C pressure test measure?

It measures whether a cable’s internal construction contains enough gaps between its conductors to allow a flame to propagate along the core. A 0.5 m cable sample is fitted to a 5,000 cm³ enclosure with minimal external compression, pressurised to 0.3 kPa and isolated. If the pressure does not drop by more than 50 per cent in 5 seconds, the cable passes. The test is scoped to inform the gland selection decision, and nothing else.

Does passing Annex C mean the cable is gas tight?

No, and the standard says so explicitly. “Gas tight” has no formal definition in IEC 60079-14 and is commercial shorthand. An Annex C pass means that tested cable construction, under those test conditions, meets the pressure retention criterion that allows an elastomeric-seal entry device under the Edition 6 flowchart. It certifies nothing beyond that.

When does the flowchart require Annex C evidence?

At specific decision points. On the IIA or IIB branch, where the cable meets the 0.5 m minimum length but the rated enclosure volume is 2,000 cm³ or greater, or cannot be confirmed. And on the IIC or IIB plus hydrogen branch with a cable of at least 3 m. In both cases, absent that evidence, a barrier-type device is required.

Can we run the test ourselves?

Yes. Annex C places no restriction on who conducts it, stating only that it may be done by the cable manufacturer or any other competent person. What it does require is competence: setting the apparatus up to specification, running the procedure correctly, and interpreting the result against the flowchart. Calibrated equipment and documented procedures are the practical bar, which is why our kit ships with both.

Do we need the UKAS calibrated version?

It depends what the record is for. If your Annex C results sit in your quality system as evidence an assessor will review, calibration traceable to national standards is what they will expect, so the UKAS version is the safer buy. If you are testing to inform your own design decisions, the non-UKAS kit does the same job for less. Where independent verification matters most, the accredited test and report is the strongest evidence of the three.

Is a cable manufacturer’s data enough?

It can be, if it is specific enough. The standard warns that a catalogue reference alone may not be adequate, because production variances change cable performance between batches. Evidence should identify the cable by manufacturer, type, size and conductor count, and rest on actual test data rather than a general product claim.

Tell us the cable, we will tell you the route.

Send us the cable specification and the enclosure volume and we will tell you whether Annex C applies at all, and whether testing in house or third-party testing makes more sense for you.

Ex training and compliance support for hazardous area equipment manufacturers.

© 2026 insightEx Ltd · Company Reg No. 15729037 · Registered in England and Wales · VAT No. 468164465insightEx